Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Insomnia Disorder.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review assessed the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on the treatment of insomnia disorder and their reporting of recommendations, while summarizing the evidence and providing guidance on an algorithmic approach to appropriate pharmacological treatment. METHODS: The PubMed and EMBASE databases, guideline repositories, and specialist association websites were searched. The quality of the CPGs was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument, complemented by the AGREE-REX (Appraisal of Guidelines REsearch and Evaluation-Recommendations EXcellence). A multidisciplinary team identified the key clinical questions that a clinician would consider when taking an algorithmic approach to the use of medication for patients with insomnia disorder. By using a meta-synthesis approach, recommendations from the CPGs were characterized and summarized via a recommendation matrix. RESULTS: A total of 10 records that met the inclusion criteria were included and appraised. Four CPGs were rated as high and 3 CPGs were rated as moderate in overall quality. Most of the CPGs recommended pharmacotherapy only if cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia or other nonpharmacological interventions were unavailable, unsuccessful, or declined by patients. Recommendations on types of medicines and dose and duration of treatment varied and were nonspecific. Few of the CPGs provided recommendations on pharmacotherapy in special populations. CONCLUSIONS: Indications for starting medications are the only common thread in all of the reviewed CPGs. The CPGs diverged in the choice of first-line pharmacotherapy, and most of the CPGs did not provide recommendations on all subsequent clinical considerations.

Lithium treatment for unipolar major depressive disorder: Systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The potential value of lithium treatment in particular aspects of unipolar major depressive disorder remains uncertain. METHODS: With reports of controlled trials identified by systematic searching of Medline, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO literature databases, we summarized responses with lithium and controls followed by selective random-effects meta-analyses. RESULTS: We identified 36 reports with 39 randomized controlled trials: six for monotherapy and 12 for adding lithium to antidepressants for acute major depression, and 21 for long-term treatment. Data for monotherapy of acute depression were few and inconclusive. As an adjunct to antidepressants, lithium was much more effective than placebo ( p<0.0001). For long-term maintenance treatment, lithium was more effective than placebo in monotherapy ( p=0.011) and to supplement antidepressants ( p=0.038), and indistinguishable from antidepressant monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate efficacy of lithium as a treatment for some aspects of major depressive disorder, especially as an add-on to antidepressants and for long-term prophylaxis. It remains uncertain whether some benefits of lithium treatment occur with many major depressive disorder patients, or if efficacy is particular to a subgroup with bipolar disorder-like characteristics or mixed-features.

Neurocognitive functioning and quality of life in patients with and without deficit syndrome of schizophrenia.

Deficit syndrome of schizophrenia is a subtype of schizophrenia characterized by primary and enduring negative symptoms. This study examined the differences in neurocognitive functioning and quality of life (QOL) between deficit and non-deficit patients, and specific predictors of both clinical measures. Overall, 344 subjects (175 patients with non-deficit schizophrenia (NDSZ), 58 patients with deficit schizophrenia (DSZ) and 111 healthy controls) were evaluated on severity of psychopathology, QOL and a smaller subset of 198 subjects (104 NDSZ, 27 DSZ, 67 healthy controls) underwent neurocognitive assessments. Multivariate analyses were used to determine differences in outcomes between subject groups and predictors of clinical measures. Both DSZ and NDSZ had significantly worse QOL compared with healthy controls. DSZ had more extensive cognitive deficits compared with healthy controls and performed worse on semantic fluency task compared to NDSZ. Multiple linear regression analysis found that DSZ, shorter duration of illness were associated with poorer QOL whereas fewer years of education, lower premorbid intelligence were associated with poorer overall neurocognitive functioning. The poorer QOL, greater extent of neurocognitive deficits especially semantic fluency associated with DSZ behoves the need for greater attention during clinical evaluation and treatment planning of this subgroup of individuals with schizophrenia.

Reducing transfers of psychiatric inpatients to emergency rooms of general hospitals in Singapore: a clinical practice improvement project.

OBJECTIVE: Patients admitted to a psychiatric hospital commonly suffer from comorbid medical problems which sometimes require urgent medical attention. Twenty-two percent of emergency medical transfers from the Institute of Mental Health (IMH) to the emergency rooms of general hospitals were preventable and could be managed at IMH itself. We undertook a quality improvement project to understand the reasons behind such preventable referrals and implemented changes to address this. METHODS: Using the model for improvement, we deconstructed our processes and analysed root causes for such preventable referrals. Thereafter changes were implemented with Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles to analyse their outcomes. RESULTS: During the 6-month study period, we achieved a 100% reduction in preventable referrals through strategies aimed at reducing pressure on our on-call physicians in the making of medical decisions, maximising usage of our medical resources, constant education and raising awareness of this issue. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing preventable transfer of inpatients from a psychiatric hospital to the emergency departments of general hospitals is a worthwhile endeavour. Such initiatives optimise use of healthcare resources, improve patient care and increase satisfaction.